Jump to content

Talk:T-Mobile (brand)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Removal of content

[edit]

@Fgnievinski and Trey Maturin: Can anyone work out what's going on with this edit? It looks like reversion to a c.2016 version but I can't find one that matches: the article has been bigger than that since 2010. Should we restore the version before that edit and repeat any subsequent edits that aren't just partially restoring the removed text? Certes (talk) 13:13, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed: it's some sort of vandalism (or a very, very misguided edit) that we've accidentally institutionalised by building on rather than reverting. I've been bold and gone back to the edit before. Now, of course, we have to pick through the subsequent (good) edits that have been lost and see if there's any new sourced info we can add back in. Well spotted, Certes. — Trey Maturin 14:24, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see any major changes except a possible inconsistency as to whether the regional setup started in 2009 (lead) or 2005 (#History). They may refer to different changes. Certes (talk) 14:54, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 4 April 2025

[edit]

T-Mobile (brand)T-Mobile – I don't think the current disambiguation page at T-Mobile should exists at all. We can explain the different companies using the brand in this article. PhotographyEdits (talk) 09:07, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. To editor PhotographyEdits: just fyi, T-Mobile is not a dab page, it is a set index list article, a whole 'nother aminal. You might want to rethink this move request. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 11:02, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Does not change my view on this, though. They all ultimately refer to the same brand name. PhotographyEdits (talk) 11:19, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Seems straightforward. Set index vs disambiguation page is not a difference that matters to readers, whereas a broad concept article covering the over-arching brand and summary detail on the subsitidiares, which this can be, it much better. This was moved without discussion from the proposed title in June 2023 so should be straightforward to move it back.  — Amakuru (talk) 19:58, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So you're saying that the SIA at T-Mobile should be deleted to make way for this article? And wouldn't that mean a trip to AfD? P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 20:17, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]